FOR DIRECTORS

See the film before you shoot it.

Direction survives contact with generation only if intent is written down in a form the system can act on. Every shot is a structured specification — framing, lens, camera move, blocking, performance, lighting — so what you asked for is what gets built, and what you rejected stays rejected.

What you get

The capabilities that matter most to this role.

Structured shot design

Specify framing, focal length, camera movement, subject blocking, action and performance in cinematography language rather than prose prompts.

Coverage before commitment

Generate storyboards and coverage proposals per scene, reorder and annotate them, then convert only the approved frames into shots.

Compare takes properly

Multi-take grid with synchronised playback and A/B compare, each take pre-scored against the spec so your attention goes to real candidates.

Selects that stick

Approvals are first-class workflow states. A promoted take carries its prompt, model, seed, references and rationale with it.

Negative constraints

Say what must not appear — no helmet, no modern objects, no extra jewellery — and have it enforced rather than hoped for.

Override the router

Automatic model routing is an optimisation, never a replacement for judgement. You can pin any shot to any model.

Your workflow

Where you sit in the production graph, start to finish.

1
Read the breakdown
Scenes, beats, cast, locations and continuity events, extracted from the locked script.
2
Set the visual language
Palette, contrast, lenses, film stock, lighting and motion rules in the style bible.
3
Approve coverage
Storyboard frames and shot lists per scene, adjusted until the coverage is right.
4
Design the shots
Turn approved frames into structured shot specs with references attached.
5
Review takes
Draft takes arrive scored. Compare, comment, reject or promote to hero quality.
6
Lock the sequence
Approved takes flow to the edit with full lineage back to your decisions.

What this solves

The failure modes generative production runs into, and how the platform answers them.

The problem	How VFX.plus handles it
Results drift from intent	Shots are specifications, not prompts. Framing, lens and blocking are fields, not adjectives.
Characters change between shots	Reference packs and continuity state carry identity, wardrobe and props across every scene.
Too many takes to review	Automated QC rejects obvious failures and ranks the rest before they reach you.
No record of why	Every approval stores the prompt, model, seed, references and reviewer.

Built for every other role too

Ready to bring your team into the loop?

Request early access and we'll walk through your production.

Request Early Access